![]() The point prevalence of chronic low back pain (cLBP) among all adults in the United States (US) is 13.1% ( 1). Here we present a brief survey of currently available SCS hardware in the US and the features that make each product unique. Outcomes: As of 2020, there are nine commonly used SCS platforms made by four manufacturers including four SCS units from Abbott, three from Boston Scientific, and one each from Medtronic and Nevro.Ĭonclusions: A working understanding of each SCS product's nuances is needed for selecting the most appropriate device with which to manage chronic pain patients. We then reviewed published device specifications and manuals for comparison of features. Measures: We used market analysis techniques to survey the currently available SCS technology. There are an even greater number of similar and overlapping features between SCS. Each marketed stimulator has several unique features, indications, and limitations, which distinguish one from the other and makes the selection of appropriate hardware possible for optimal patient care. 3Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United Statesīackground: The number of spinal cord stimulator (SCS) units sold in the United States (US) for the treatment of chronic pain has increased with a corresponding expansion in the number of different SCS platforms available. ![]() 2Geisinger Medical Group, Danville, PA, United States.1Southeastern Interventional Pain Associates, Atlanta, GA, United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |